Search
advanced search
search help
ipHandbook Blog
Your source for expert commentary on IP management issues.
Go to the blog
In ipHandbook Forums
See recent topics
About
Editor-in-Chief, Anatole Krattiger
Editorial Board
Concept Foundation
PIPRA
Fiocruz, Brazil
bioDevelopments- Institute
|
HANSEN, Stephen A
Stephen A. Hansen is Project Director with the Science & Human Rights Program. His work currently focuses on projects that relate to the effects of intellectual property rights on science, particularly those that relate to traditional knowledge and human rights. He serves as the Project Manager for an AAAS project: Science & Intellectual Property in the Public Interest (SIPPI). He is co-author of the handbook Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property. He also designed the Traditional Ecological Knowledge Prior Art Database (T.E.K.*P.A.D), an online digital archive of traditional practices from local communities throughout the world that are already in the public domain. Mr. Hansen’s other main area of work is in economic, social, and cultural rights (ESCR); he has worked with the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and UNESCO in this capacity. He is the author of a chapter on cultural rights in the AAAS publication Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. He has also been involved in violations monitoring and documentation and has authored The Thesaurus of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. He has directed projects with the National Commission for Human Rights in Honduras, as well as the Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (Center for Legal and Social Research, CELS) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Mr. Hansen holds a Bachelor’s degree in Anthropology from Oberlin College and an M.A. in Anthropology from The George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
Abstract
Facilitating Humanitarian Access to Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Innovation
Abstract:
Because certain patenting and licensing strategies can inhibit the development and dissemination of products for developing countries, intellectual property management strategies need to be developed that can help remove some of these obstacles. It is equally important to apply creative patent management strategies that actively promote access to needed products in developing countries. Care must be taken, however, to ensure that patents on research inputs do not discourage or unreasonably increase the cost for product development that targets needs in small or unprofitable markets. The American Association for the Advancement of Science project on Science and Intellectual Property in the Public Interest convened a working group to explore these issues in 2004. This chapter draws upon the expertise of that group to identify licensing strategies that are effective in promoting humanitarian access to health and agricultural product innovations and expanding their use among poor and disadvantaged groups, particularly in low-income countries. The chapter encourages more public sector IP managers to understand and employ strategies that will achieve these goals and seeks to help private sector licensees to understand the rationale behind and potential benefits of such strategies. Indeed, humanitarian licensing strategies should more and more become the norm by contributing to the development and dissemination of essential medicines and agricultural technologies for developing countries.
Abstract
Issues and Options for Traditional Knowledge Holders in Protecting Their Intellectual Property
Abstract:
Traditional knowledge (TK) is the information that people in a given community, based on experience and adapted to local culture and environment, have developed over time and that continues to develop. This knowledge is used to sustain the community and its culture, as well as the biological resources necessary for the continued survival of the community. Since 1948, international human-rights standards have recognized the importance of protecting intellectual property. Yet, to date, intellectual property (IP) rights are not adequately extended to the holders of TK. The requirements for IP rights protections under current IP regimes remain largely inconsistent with the nature of TK. As a result, it is neglected and considered part of the public domain with no protections or benefits for the knowledge holders, or expropriated for the financial gains of others, often referred to as biopiracy. This chapter presents basic IP concepts in the context of TK with specific attention to identifying, classifying, and protecting elements of TK. The advantages and disadvantages of the various IP protection options are discussed, and a number of case studies are presented to facilitate a better understanding of each option or issue.
|