Search
site map
IP Handbook Blog
Your source for expert commentary on IP management issues.
Go to the blog
About
MIHR
PIPRA
Fiocruz, Brazil
bioDevelopments- Institute
|
HEHER, Anthony D
Anthony D. Heher has a longstanding interest in research and innovation and the contribution that they can make to economic and social development. His experience includes 12 years at South Africa’s Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR); 16 years as founder and CEO of a high-tech spinout company based on his doctoral research; and ten years working in economic development, including two years at the South African Department of Trade & Industry, where he was Chief Director for Industrial Promotion in 1997 and head of the national economic cluster program. From 2000 to 2005, he was Director of UCT Innovation at the University of Cape Town. In 2006, he rejoined AfED, an economic and business consultancy that he founded in 1998. He is actively involved in a projects ranging from entrepreneurship development to economic development through public-private partnerships. He was instrumental in the establishment of the Southern African Research & Innovation Management Association (SARIMA) in 2001 and was its founding President. SARIMA is focused on capacity building and linking the various players in the research and innovation spectrum so that they can cooperate more effectively. He has a Ph.D. in engineering. He has had a varied academic career: he is a graduate of the Universities of Natal, Pretoria, and California in Physics, Mathematics, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science; he also holds an executive M.B.A. from Wits Business School. He has remained an active researcher his whole working life, although his research output has taken rather varied forms!
Abstract
Benchmarking of Technology Transfer Offices and What It Means for Developing Countries
Abstract:
At universities in both developed and developing countries, increasing emphasis has been placed on promoting technology transfer. Unfortunately, technology transfer is sometimes undertaken for the wrong reasons, especially in the mistaken belief that technology transfer will lead to substantial additional income for the institution. While it is important to protect intellectual property arising from research and to actively promote the transfer of research results, generating income should not be the primary objective in the transfer of technology. This is particularly important for health science, where there is a risk that research results, if not properly protected, will be inaccessible to private or public entities seeking to use the research for public benefit.
International technology transfer benchmark data can be used to understand the implications of promoting technology transfer and the likely outcomes of a technology transfer initiative. The benchmarks indicate that average income to an institution, after eight to ten years of activity, is likely to be a modest 1%–2% of annual research expenditure. The income is, moreover, highly uncertain and variable. Institutional and public sector managers must understand the nature of this income and the dynamics of the technology transfer process in order to manage this emerging discipline effectively, because unrealistic expectations can lead to dysfunctional policy decisions. The data and dynamic model presented in this paper are intended to promote better decisions.
|