TopTop

Shadow

Search

advanced search
search help

 

ipHandbook Blog

Your source for expert commentary on IP management issues.
Go to the blog

 

About

Editor-in-Chief,   Anatole Krattiger

Editorial Board

Concept Foundation

PIPRA

Fiocruz, Brazil

bioDevelopments-   Institute

Bioprospecting, Traditional Knowledge, and Benefit Sharing
Topic Guide for Technology Transfer Managers

Why This Topic Is Important

It is anticipated that biodiversity and indigenous peoples’ traditional knowledge, as sources of discovery similar in some ways to research, may be important sources of new technology for the future. While the underlying dynamics are similar—involving documentation, protection, uncertainty, risk, rights, investment, partnership, R&D, and marketing—there are legal issues that set these sources of new knowledge apart. This section discusses approaches, policies, and mechanisms for managing biodiversity as an input to R&D, within the context of the rapidly evolving international and national legal frameworks for biodiversity resources and traditional knowledge.

Key Implications and Best Practices: Section 16

Given that IP management is heavily context specific, these Key Implications and Best Practices are intended as starting points to be adapted to specific needs and circumstances.

  • The three guiding principles for a successful relationship in bioprospecting and related endeavors are a commitment to maintaining a fair, trusting, long-term relationship; efficient and reasonable authorization; and the equitable sharing of benefits between a company and its collaborators in the host country.
  • The western system of IP rights, and particularly of patenting, is based on the premise that anything that is already known cannot be protected. Indigenous knowledge is often communal, has been disclosed, and has been passed on from previous generations. the very nature of indigenous knowledge, therefore, does not meet some of the criteria for intellectual property protection (such as novelty).
  • A successful biodiversity access agreement includes a clear definition and assignment of legal rights to all genetic resources involved; prior informed consent from all domestic parties affected by the bioprospecting (including landowners and managers); a clear statement of rights to patent and commercialize products derived from discoveries made; and terms of confidentiality. The BAA also establishes a noncompetitive relationship between the parties; trust that no transfer of proprietary technologies or technical capacity involved under the agreement will occur with respect to third parties; and that no exclusivity requirements exist.
  • Patent laws per se do not “create” biopiracy. Rather, biopiracy is a form of misappropriation, unfair acquisition, and inequitable sharing of benefits with respect to biological resources.
  • Prior informed consent is an important principle in bioprospecting. This should include informed consent in the case of collection and use of plant/genetic materials, as well as informed consent of individuals and their communities regarding traditional medicinal use or uses of a plant.
  • When dealing with foreign bioprospectors, your office will function as the gateway and regulator of their activities. As such, technology transfer officers will provide oversight to negotiating agreements for equitable sharing of rewards, defining access, discussing possible patentability, and protecting the rights of the indigenous peoples who are the stewards of these resources.
  • Negotiating access to your country’s genetic resources, biodiversity, and TK will require a balanced, nuanced approach. equitable benefit sharing must simultaneously ensure fair returns to your country, yet not inhibit the R&D initiatives of foreign partners. Solid agreements will benefit all parties: your country, your partnering organization, and the country or community that provides the resource. Extreme situations, such as an expectation of immediate windfall returns or wanton biopiracy by outsiders, will freeze the resources and ultimately lead to their demise.
  • Both monetary and nonmonetary benefits may be attractive to the university or institute; both, therefore, should be considered. Nonmonetary benefits could include training opportunities for scientists and donation of equipment.

Recommended Chapters       Show All AbstractsShow All Abstracts

Show AbstractAbstract Access and Benefit Sharing: Illustrated Procedures for the Collection and Importation of Biological Materials
by Carl-Gustaf Thornström, Lars Björk

Show AbstractAbstract Access and Benefit Sharing: Understanding the Rules for Collection and Use of Biological Materials
by Carl-Gustaf Thornström

Show AbstractAbstract Bioprospecting Arrangements: Cooperation between the North and the South
by Djaja Djendoel Soejarto, C. Gyllenhaal, Jill A. Tarzian Sorensen, H.H.S. Fong, L.T. Xuan, L.T. Binh, N.T. Hiep, N.V. Hung, B.M. Vu, T.Q. Bich, B.H. Southavong, K. Sydara, J.M. Pezzuto, M.C. Riley

Show AbstractAbstract Deal Making in Bioprospecting
by Charles Costanza, Leif Christoffersen, Carolyn Anderson, Jay M. Short